RTF (Rich Text Format)

A cross-platform document format for exchanging formatted text between applications

Overview

The Rich Text Format (RTF) is a document file format developed by Microsoft in 1987 as a cross-platform, application-independent way to exchange formatted text documents. RTF serves as a middle ground between plain text files and more complex document formats, offering basic formatting capabilities while maintaining wide compatibility.

Unlike proprietary binary formats, RTF files use a plain text format with special markup codes to denote formatting, making them human-readable (though not easily) and more accessible to different applications. The format allows for styled text, embedded images, tables, and other basic document elements.

While RTF has been superseded by more advanced formats for complex documents, it remains important as an interchange format and is supported by virtually all word processors and many text editors across different operating systems, making it a reliable choice for basic formatted document exchange.

Technical Specifications

File Extension .rtf
MIME Type application/rtf
Developer Microsoft Corporation
Type Text-based markup
Latest Version RTF 1.9.1 (2008)
Encoding ASCII with control codes
Media Support Text, basic images, tables
Character Support Unicode through escape sequences

RTF files use a markup syntax with opening and closing braces {} to group control words that define document structure and formatting. Control words begin with a backslash followed by alphabetic characters (e.g., \bold for bold text). This text-based structure makes RTF more open and accessible than binary formats, though less powerful than modern XML-based formats.

Advantages & Disadvantages

Advantages

  • Widespread compatibility across platforms and applications
  • Text-based format readable without specialized software
  • Supports basic document formatting (bold, italic, fonts, etc.)
  • More reliable exchange format than proprietary formats
  • Can include simple graphics and tables
  • Relatively stable specification with decades of support
  • No macros or scripts, reducing security concerns
  • Easier to parse programmatically than binary formats

Disadvantages

  • Limited support for advanced formatting and layout
  • Files can be larger than equivalent binary formats
  • No support for modern document features like comments or tracked changes
  • Image support is basic and sometimes unreliable
  • No standardized support for hyperlinks
  • Limited metadata capabilities
  • Formatting interpretation can vary between applications
  • No longer actively developed or updated

Common Use Cases

Cross-Platform Document Exchange

RTF is ideal when sharing basic formatted documents across different operating systems or applications. It offers a reliable middle ground between plain text and advanced formats when you need to preserve basic formatting but aren't sure what software the recipient is using.

Simple Formatted Documents

For documents that need only basic formatting (font styles, sizes, colors, paragraph alignment, simple tables), RTF provides adequate capabilities without the complexity or compatibility concerns of more advanced formats. It's perfect for memos, simple letters, and basic reports.

System Integration

Many legacy systems and applications use RTF as an output format for automated document generation because of its simplicity and wide compatibility. It's common in healthcare, banking, and government systems that need to generate formatted reports across diverse IT environments.

Clipboard Operations

RTF is often used as an intermediate format for clipboard operations in operating systems. When you copy formatted text from one application to another, RTF is frequently the format used behind the scenes to preserve basic formatting during the transfer.

Email Content

Many email clients use RTF for formatted email composition and display. Its balance of formatting capabilities and security (no macro support) makes it suitable for email content where HTML might be filtered or considered a security risk.

Compatibility

Word Processor Compatibility

RTF is broadly supported by word processors:

  • Microsoft Word: Full support for reading and writing RTF
  • LibreOffice/OpenOffice Writer: Good support with occasional rendering differences
  • Google Docs: Can import and export RTF files
  • Apple Pages: Supports RTF import and export
  • WordPerfect: Includes RTF import and export capabilities
  • AbiWord: Offers good support for basic RTF features

Text Editor Compatibility

Many text editors can handle RTF files:

  • Windows WordPad: Native RTF support
  • TextEdit (macOS): Good RTF support
  • Notepad++ (with plugin): Can view RTF structure
  • Various other editors: May offer basic RTF support

Operating System Support

RTF works across major platforms:

  • Windows: Native support through WordPad and other applications
  • macOS: Native support through TextEdit and other applications
  • Linux: Support through LibreOffice, OpenOffice, and other applications
  • Mobile OS: Many document apps on iOS and Android support RTF

Feature Compatibility

Different RTF features have varying levels of cross-application support:

  • Text formatting: Good cross-application support
  • Tables: Generally good support with occasional alignment issues
  • Images: Basic support, but positioning may vary
  • Special characters: Good Unicode support in modern applications
  • Document structure: Basic elements like headers and footers usually transfer well

Comparison with Similar Formats

Feature RTF TXT DOC DOCX HTML
Compatibility ★★★★☆ ★★★★★ ★★★☆☆ ★★★★☆ ★★★★☆
Formatting Capabilities ★★★☆☆ ★☆☆☆☆ ★★★★☆ ★★★★★ ★★★★☆
Open Format ★★★★☆ ★★★★★ ★☆☆☆☆ ★★★☆☆ ★★★★★
File Size Efficiency ★★☆☆☆ ★★★★★ ★★★☆☆ ★★★★☆ ★★★☆☆
Modern Features ★★☆☆☆ ★☆☆☆☆ ★★★☆☆ ★★★★★ ★★★★☆
Human Readability ★★☆☆☆ ★★★★★ ★☆☆☆☆ ★★☆☆☆ ★★★☆☆

RTF occupies a middle ground between plain text (maximum compatibility but no formatting) and advanced formats like DOCX (rich features but more complex). HTML offers similar cross-platform benefits with better modern feature support, while DOC provides more capabilities but with less openness and compatibility.

Conversion Tips

Converting To RTF

From DOCX/DOC

When converting from Microsoft Word formats to RTF, expect to lose advanced formatting features. Use the "Save As" function in Word and select "Rich Text Format (*.rtf)". Review the document after conversion to check for any significant formatting changes, particularly with complex tables, embedded objects, or custom styles.

From Plain Text

Converting from TXT to RTF allows you to add formatting to plain text. Open the text file in a word processor, apply desired formatting (headings, bold, etc.), and save as RTF. This is a straightforward process with minimal complications since you're adding formatting rather than trying to preserve it.

From HTML

HTML to RTF conversion can be challenging with complex web pages. Basic formatting usually transfers well, but complex layouts and CSS styling may not convert accurately. Use a word processor's import feature or specialized conversion tools, and be prepared to adjust formatting after conversion.

Converting From RTF

To DOCX/DOC

RTF to Word format conversion generally works well for basic documents. Open the RTF file in Word and save in the desired format. The process preserves most formatting, though you may need to adjust styles for optimal results. After conversion, you can take advantage of Word's additional formatting features not available in RTF.

To PDF

Creating a PDF from RTF produces a fixed-layout document ideal for distribution. Most word processors offer "Export to PDF" functionality, or you can use a virtual PDF printer. For best results, ensure all fonts are properly embedded and check the quality of any images included in the document.

To Plain Text

Converting RTF to TXT will strip all formatting, leaving only the textual content. Open the RTF in a word processor and save as "Plain Text" or "Text Only". Most applications will prompt you about character encoding and line break handling during this conversion.

RTF Format Best Practices

  • Keep formatting relatively simple when maximum compatibility is important
  • Use common fonts available on most systems
  • Test RTF files on different applications if they'll be widely distributed
  • Avoid relying on complex tables or precise image positioning
  • Consider PDF as an alternative when exact layout preservation is crucial
  • Use styles consistently for better formatting results
  • Keep embedded images at reasonable resolutions to manage file size

Frequently Asked Questions

Is RTF still relevant today?
Yes, RTF remains relevant for specific use cases despite the availability of newer formats. Its wide compatibility makes it valuable for cross-platform document exchange when basic formatting is needed. It's still used in system integrations, clipboard operations, and environments where compatibility with older systems is important. However, for documents with advanced formatting needs or collaborative features, newer formats like DOCX or cloud-based solutions are generally preferred.
Why are my RTF files larger than DOCX files?
RTF files are often larger than equivalent DOCX files because RTF uses text-based markup to represent formatting, while DOCX uses compressed XML. The plain text nature of RTF formatting codes takes more space than the binary storage of DOCX's ZIP container. Additionally, DOCX uses more efficient methods for storing images and other embedded content. The size difference becomes more pronounced with complex documents containing multiple images or elaborate formatting.
Can RTF files contain viruses or malware?
RTF files are generally safer than formats like DOC or DOCX because they don't support macros or embedded executable content. However, RTF can still be exploited through specially crafted files that take advantage of vulnerabilities in RTF parsers. Historical security issues have included the "RTF Stack Buffer Overflow Vulnerability" and various control word exploits. As with any file format, it's always important to use updated software and scan files from untrusted sources.
Why does my formatting look different when I open my RTF file in different applications?
Formatting inconsistencies between applications occur because each application interprets the RTF specification slightly differently. Common issues include variations in font rendering, table layout, image positioning, and margin handling. Additionally, some applications support different versions of the RTF specification or implement optional features differently. For consistent appearance across platforms, consider using PDF format instead, which is designed specifically for layout preservation.
What's the difference between RTF and HTML for document formatting?
While both RTF and HTML are text-based formats for formatted content, they serve different primary purposes. RTF was designed for document exchange between word processors, focusing on page-oriented content with fixed formatting. HTML was created for web content with flexible, reflowable layouts. HTML offers better support for hyperlinks, multimedia, and interactive elements, while RTF is more oriented toward printable documents. HTML has evolved continuously with web standards, while RTF has remained relatively static since 2008.